4.4 Article

The long way ahead to achieve an effective patient safety culture: challenges perceived by nurses

期刊

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3467-1

关键词

Quality improvement; Clinical risk management; Patient safety; Organizational culture; Qualitative content analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The safety culture has recently attracted the attention of healthcare organizations. Considering the importance of the roles of nurses with regard to patient safety, their knowledge and experiences of the challenges that influence patient safety culture can facilitate the development and implementation of better strategies. The aim of this study was to explore the nurses' experiences of the challenges influencing the implementation and integration of safety culture in healthcare. Methods: A qualitative study with deep and semi-structured individual interviews was carried out using a purposive sampling method to select 23 nurses from four hospitals affiliated with a large medical university in Southeast Iran. Data were analysed using the conventional content analysis of Lundman and Graneheim. Results: Data analysis reflected the main theme of the study, A long way ahead of safety culture. This theme includes four categories: 1) inadequate organizational infrastructure, 2) insufficient leadership effectiveness, 3) inadequate efforts to keep pace with national and international standards, and 4) overshadowed values of team participation. Conclusion: While practical strategies for creating a safety culture may seem simple, their implementation is not necessarily easy. There are several challenges ahead for cultivating an effective and positive safety culture in healthcare organizations. To keep pace with international standards, healthcare managers must employ modern methods of management in order to overcome the challenges faced by the institutionalization of safety culture and to make a difference in the healthcare system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据