3.8 Article

Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Computed Tomography in Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke: The More You See the More You Know

期刊

CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES EXTRA
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 130-136

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000355024

关键词

Transient ischemic attack; Mild stroke; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; Computed tomography

资金

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR)
  2. Pfizer Cardiovascular

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is proposed as the preferred imaging modality to investigate patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA). This is mainly based on a higher yield of small acute ischemic lesions; however, direct prospective comparisons are lacking. In this study, we aimed to directly compare the yield of acute ischemic lesions on MRI and computed tomography (CT) in the emergency diagnosis of suspected TIA or minor stroke. Methods: Consecutive patients aged 18 years or older presenting with minor stroke (NIHSS < 4) or high-risk TIA and who were examined by a stroke neurologist within 24 h of symptom onset were prospectively enrolled in the CATCH study. Patients who had undergone both a baseline CT and an MRI within 24 h of symptom onset were included in this substudy. Baseline MRI and CT were interpreted independently to identify an acute ischemic lesion. The rates of acute ischemic lesions on CT and MRI were compared, and the volume of acute ischemic lesions was measured on MRI. In addition, the volume of acute ischemic lesions on MRI was compared between patients who had evidence of acute ischemia on CT and in those who did not. Results: A total of 347 patients were included, 168 with TIAs, 147 with minor strokes and using MRI versus 8% by using CT (p < 0.0001) and in 86% of minor strokes by using MRI versus 18% by using CT (p < 0.0001). Compared to MRI, CT had a sensitivity of 20% and a specificity of 98% in identifying an acute ischemic lesion. The infarct volume on diffusion-weighted MRI was larger in cases where the CT also showed an acute ischemic lesion (median 5.07 ml, IQR 10) as compared to lesions seen only on MRI (median 0.68 ml, IQR 1.31, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: MRI is superior to CT in detecting the small ischemic lesions occurring after TIA and minor stroke. Since these lesions are clinically relevant, MRI should be the preferred imaging modality in this setting. (C)2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据