4.7 Article

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockin in the hydroid Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus

期刊

BMC GENOMICS
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-5032-z

关键词

Genome editing; Immunohistochemistry; Cnidaria; Invertebrate; Model organism; Transgenic; FLAG; eGFP; tdTomato; P2A

资金

  1. NSF [IOS1557339]
  2. Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute
  3. Science Foundation Ireland Principal Investigator award [11/PI/1020]
  4. NIH [ZIA-HG000140, T32AI074490]
  5. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [ZIAHG000140] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [T32AI074490] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus, a colonial cnidarian, is a tractable model system for many cnidarian-specific and general biological questions. Until recently, tests of gene function in Hydractinia have relied on laborious forward genetic approaches, randomly integrated transgenes, or transient knockdown of mRNAs. Results: Here, we report the use of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to generate targeted genomic insertions in H. symbiolonigcarpus. We used CRISPR/Cas9 to promote homologous recombination of two fluorescent reporters, eGFP and tdTomato, into the Eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha (Eef1a) locus. We demonstrate that the transgenes are expressed ubiquitously and are stable over two generations of breeding. We further demonstrate that CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing can be used to mark endogenous proteins with FLAG or StrepII-FLAG affinity tags to enable in vivo and ex vivo protein studies. Conclusions: This is the first account of CRISPR/Cas9 mediated knockins in Hydractinia and the first example of the germline transmission of a CRISPR/Cas9 inserted transgene in a cnidarian. The ability to precisely insert exogenous DNA into the Hydractinia genome will enable sophisticated genetic studies and further development of functional genomics tools in this understudied cnidarian model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据