4.7 Article

Transfer of clinically relevant gene expression signatures in breast cancer: from Affymetrix microarray to Illumina RNA-Sequencing technology

期刊

BMC GENOMICS
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1008

关键词

Breast cancer; Gene expression signatures; Affymetrix; Microarray; Illumina; RNA-Seq; Immunohistochemistry; Estrogen receptor; Progesterone receptor; HER2 receptor

资金

  1. Plan National Cancer (Belgium)
  2. Gattuso Slaight Personalized Cancer Medicine Fund at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Microarrays have revolutionized breast cancer (BC) research by enabling studies of gene expression on a transcriptome wide scale. Recently, RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) has emerged as an alternative for precise readouts of the transcriptome. To date, no study has compared the ability of the two technologies to quantify clinically relevant individual genes and microarray-derived gene expression signatures (GES) in a set of BC samples encompassing the known molecular BC's subtypes. To accomplish this, the RNA from 57 BCs representing the four main molecular subtypes (triple negative, HER2 positive, luminal A, luminal B), was profiled with Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 chips and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. The correlations of three clinically relevant BC genes, six molecular subtype classifiers, and a selection of 21 GES were evaluated. Results: 16,097 genes common to the two platforms were retained for downstream analysis. Gene-wise comparison of microarray and RNA-Seq data revealed that 52% had a Spearman's correlation coefficient greater than 0.7 with highly correlated genes displaying significantly higher expression levels. We found excellent correlation between microarray and RNA-Seq for the estrogen receptor (ER; r(s) = 0.973; 95% CI: 0.971-0.975), progesterone receptor (PgR; r(s) = 0.95; 0.947-0.954), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; r(s) = 0.918; 0.912-0.923), while a few discordances between ER and PgR quantified by immunohistochemistry and RNA-Seq/microarray were observed. All the subtype classifiers evaluated agreed well (Cohen's kappa coefficients >0.8) and all the proliferation-based GES showed excellent Spearman correlations between microarray and RNA-Seq (all r(s) >0.965). Immune-, stroma- and pathway-based GES showed a lower correlation relative to prognostic signatures (all r(s) >0.6). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to report a systematic comparison of RNA-Seq to microarray for the evaluation of single genes and GES clinically relevant to BC. According to our results, the vast majority of single gene biomarkers and well-established GES can be reliably evaluated using the RNA-Seq technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据