4.7 Article

Transcriptional landscape of repetitive elements in normal and cancer human cells

期刊

BMC GENOMICS
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-583

关键词

Retrotransposon; Transposable element; Prostate cancer; LINE-1; L1; LTR; HERV; Repetitive element; RNA-seq; ChIP-seq

资金

  1. NIH/NIA [K25 AG028753, K25 AG028753-03S1, R37 AG016694]
  2. NIH/NIGMS Institutional Research Training Grant [T32 GM007601]
  3. GRO Research Project from Samsung SAIT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Repetitive elements comprise at least 55% of the human genome with more recent estimates as high as two-thirds. Most of these elements are retrotransposons, DNA sequences that can insert copies of themselves into new genomic locations by a copy and paste mechanism. These mobile genetic elements play important roles in shaping genomes during evolution, and have been implicated in the etiology of many human diseases. Despite their abundance and diversity, few studies investigated the regulation of endogenous retrotransposons at the genome-wide scale, primarily because of the technical difficulties of uniquely mapping high-throughput sequencing reads to repetitive DNA. Results: Here we develop a new computational method called RepEnrich to study genome-wide transcriptional regulation of repetitive elements. We show that many of the Long Terminal Repeat retrotransposons in humans are transcriptionally active in a cell line-specific manner. Cancer cell lines display increased RNA Polymerase II binding to retrotransposons than cell lines derived from normal tissue. Consistent with increased transcriptional activity of retrotransposons in cancer cells we found significantly higher levels of L1 retrotransposon RNA expression in prostate tumors compared to normal-matched controls. Conclusions: Our results support increased transcription of retrotransposons in transformed cells, which may explain the somatic retrotransposition events recently reported in several types of cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据