4.7 Article

Detecting tropical forest biomass dynamics from repeated airborne lidar measurements

期刊

BIOGEOSCIENCES
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 5421-5438

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-10-5421-2013

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [0939907]
  2. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
  3. University of Illinois
  4. University of California Los Angeles
  5. Clemson University
  6. French Investissement d'avenir [CEBA: ANR-10-LABX-0025, TULIP: ANR-10-LABX-0041]
  7. TOSCA funds (CNES, France)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reducing uncertainty of terrestrial carbon cycle depends strongly on the accurate estimation of changes of global forest carbon stock. However, this is a challenging problem from either ground surveys or remote sensing techniques in tropical forests. Here, we examine the feasibility of estimating changes of tropical forest biomass from two airborne lidar measurements of forest height acquired about 10 yr apart over Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama. We used the forest inventory data from the 50 ha Center for Tropical Forest Science (CTFS) plot collected every 5 yr during the study period to calibrate the estimation. We compared two approaches for detecting changes in forest aboveground biomass (AGB): (1) relating changes in lidar height metrics from two sensors directly to changes in ground-estimated biomass; and (2) estimating biomass from each lidar sensor and then computing changes in biomass from the difference of two biomass estimates, using two models, namely one model based on five relative height metrics and the other based only on mean canopy height (MCH). We performed the analysis at different spatial scales from 0.04 ha to 10 ha. Method (1) had large uncertainty in directly detecting biomass changes at scales smaller than 10 ha, but provided detailed information about changes of forest structure. The magnitude of error associated with both the mean biomass stock and mean biomass change declined with increasing spatial scales. Method (2) was accurate at the 1 ha scale to estimate AGB stocks (R-2 = 0.7 and RMSEmean = 27.6 Mg ha(-1)). However, to predict biomass changes, errors became comparable to ground estimates only at a spatial scale of about 10 ha or more. Biomass changes were in the same direction at the spatial scale of 1 ha in 60 to 64% of the subplots, corresponding to p values of respectively 0.1 and 0.033. Large errors in estimating biomass changes from lidar data resulted from the uncertainty in detecting changes at 1 ha from ground census data, differences of approximately one year between the ground census and lidar measurements, and differences in sensor characteristics. Our results indicate that the 50 ha BCI plot lost a significant amount of biomass (-0.8Mg ha(-1) yr(-1) +/- 2.2(SD)) over the past decade (2000-2010). Over the entire island and during the same period, mean AGB change was 0.2 +/- 2.4Mg ha(-1) yr(-1) with old growth forests losing -0.7 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1) +/- 2.2 (SD), and secondary forests gaining +1.8Mg ha yr(-1) +/- 3.4 (SD) biomass. Our analysis suggests that repeated lidar surveys, despite taking measurement with different sensors, can estimate biomass changes in old-growth tropical forests at landscape scales (> 10 ha).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据