4.7 Article

Sequencing the genome of Marssonina brunnea reveals fungus-poplar co-evolution

期刊

BMC GENOMICS
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-382

关键词

Marssonina leaf spot; Genome sequencing; Host-pathogen interaction; Poplar

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB19100]
  2. Doctorate Fellowship Foundation of Nanjing Forestry University
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [10QA1400600]
  4. Graduate Research Innovation Project of Jiangsu Province
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  6. Changjiang Scholars Award
  7. One-thousand Person Plan Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The fungus Marssonina brunnea is a causal pathogen of Marssonina leaf spot that devastates poplar plantations by defoliating susceptible trees before normal fall leaf drop. Results: We sequence the genome of M. brunnea with a size of 52 Mb assembled into 89 scaffolds, representing the first sequenced Dermateaceae genome. By inoculating this fungus onto a poplar hybrid clone, we investigate how M. brunnea interacts and co-evolves with its host to colonize poplar leaves. While a handful of virulence genes in M. brunnea, mostly from the LysM family, are detected to up-regulate during infection, the poplar down-regulates its resistance genes, such as nucleotide binding site domains and leucine rich repeats, in response to infection. From 10,027 predicted proteins of M. brunnea in a comparison with those from poplar, we identify four poplar transferases that stimulate the host to resist M. brunnea. These transferas-encoding genes may have driven the co-evolution of M. brunnea and Populus during the process of infection and anti-infection. Conclusions: Our results from the draft sequence of the M. brunnea genome provide evidence for genome-genome interactions that play an important role in poplar-pathogen co-evolution. This knowledge could help to design effective strategies for controlling Marssonina leaf spot in poplar.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据