4.7 Article

Multiple platform assessment of the EGF dependent transcriptome by microarray and deep tag sequencing analysis

期刊

BMC GENOMICS
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-326

关键词

-

资金

  1. institute for Predictive and Personalized Medicine of Cancer
  2. Center for Genomic Regulation
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology [SAF2004-06976]
  4. Juan de la Cierva
  5. Catalan government
  6. Departament de Innovacio
  7. Universitats i Ensenyament
  8. Generalitat de Catalunya [SGR2005-404, SGR2009-0366]
  9. Instituto de Salud Carlos III Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias [PI10/01154]
  10. Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) is a key regulatory growth factor activating many processes relevant to normal development and disease, affecting cell proliferation and survival. Here we use a combined approach to study the EGF dependent transcriptome of HeLa cells by using multiple long oligonucleotide based microarray platforms (from Agilent, Operon, and Illumina) in combination with digital gene expression profiling (DGE) with the Illumina Genome Analyzer. Results: By applying a procedure for cross-platform data meta-analysis based on RankProd and GlobalAncova tests, we establish a well validated gene set with transcript levels altered after EGF treatment. We use this robust gene list to build higher order networks of gene interaction by interconnecting associated networks, supporting and extending the important role of the EGF signaling pathway in cancer. In addition, we find an entirely new set of genes previously unrelated to the currently accepted EGF associated cellular functions. Conclusions: We propose that the use of global genomic cross-validation derived from high content technologies (microarrays or deep sequencing) can be used to generate more reliable datasets. This approach should help to improve the confidence of downstream in silico functional inference analyses based on high content data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据