4.5 Article

Quantitative analysis of acetyl-CoA production in hypoxic cancer cells reveals substantial contribution from acetate

期刊

CANCER & METABOLISM
卷 2, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/2049-3002-2-23

关键词

Acetate; Acetyl-CoA; Cancer metabolism; Fatty acids; Hypoxia; Lipogenesis; Mass spectrometry; Palmitate; C-13-tracing

资金

  1. Hope Funds for Cancer Research Fellow [HFCR-11-03-01]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute International Student Research Fellow
  3. NIH [P50GM071508, 1R01CA16359-01A1]
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA163591, P30CA016359] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P50GM071508] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Cell growth requires fatty acids for membrane synthesis. Fatty acids are assembled from 2-carbon units in the form of acetyl-CoA (AcCoA). In nutrient and oxygen replete conditions, acetyl-CoA is predominantly derived from glucose. In hypoxia, however, flux from glucose to acetyl-CoA decreases, and the fractional contribution of glutamine to acetyl-CoA increases. The significance of other acetyl-CoA sources, however, has not been rigorously evaluated. Here we investigate quantitatively, using C-13-tracers and mass spectrometry, the sources of acetyl-CoA in hypoxia. Results: In normoxic conditions, cultured cells produced more than 90% of acetyl-CoA from glucose and glutamine-derived carbon. In hypoxic cells, this contribution dropped, ranging across cell lines from 50% to 80%. Thus, under hypoxia, one or more additional substrates significantly contribute to acetyl-CoA production. 13C-tracer experiments revealed that neither amino acids nor fatty acids are the primary source of this acetyl-CoA. Instead, the main additional source is acetate. A large contribution from acetate occurs despite it being present in the medium at a low concentration (50-500 mu M). Conclusions: Acetate is an important source of acetyl-CoA in hypoxia. Inhibition of acetate metabolism may impair tumor growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据