4.4 Article

Genome-wide and local pattern of linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase for 3 Danish pig breeds

期刊

BMC GENETICS
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-14-115

关键词

Linkage disequilibrium; Persistence of phase; Danish pig breeds; Model local LD; Visualize local LD variation

资金

  1. Green Development and Demonstration Programme [3405-11-0279]
  2. Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries
  3. Pig Research Centre
  4. Aarhus University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The extent of linkage disequilibrium (LD) is of critical importance for genomic selection and marker assisted selection. The primary purpose of this study is to examine patterns of LD in three Danish pig breeds (Duroc, Landrace and Yorkshire); we also examine patterns of persistence of phase between the breeds. We quantify local LD by fitting a model relating LD to physical distance between markers in sliding windows, and use this to visualize how LD varies according to physical position. We use a similar method to examine local persistence of phase. Results: Average LD decay over distance for Duroc was significantly different from Landrace and Yorkshire, that showed similar patterns. Persistence of phase between Landrace and Yorkshire was much higher than between these breeds and Duroc. Local r(2) over the chromosomes showed more variation between breeds than average r(2) decay across whole genome. Also local persistence of phase was higher between Landrace and Yorkshire than between these breeds and Duroc. Conclusions: The results concerning genome-wide LD indicated that Duroc had old inbreeding, and confirmed the mixture history of Landrace and Yorkshire, which is also implied by the higher level of persistence of phase between Landrace and Yorkshire. The method to estimate and visualize local pattern of LD and persistence of phase provides insight into how these quantities vary along chromosomes and between breeds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据