4.3 Article

Comparative proteomics study on liver mitochondria of primary biliary cirrhosis mouse model

期刊

BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-64

关键词

Primary biliary cirrhosis; Proteomics; iTRAQ; Molecular pathogenesis

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2009CB522204, 2011AA02A113]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30971447, 30872331, 81072486]
  3. Ministry of Health of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a liver specific chronic disease with unclear pathogenesis, especially for the early stage molecular events. The mitochondrion is a multi-functional organelle associated with various diseases including PBC. The purpose of this study was to discover the alterations in the mitochondria proteome using an early stage PBC mouse model for revealing the possible pathogenesis mechanisms in the early stages of PBC. Methods: Mouse model of early stage of PBC was constructed by consecutive administration of poly I:C. Mitochondria of mouse models and controls were purified and comparative proteomics was performed by iTRAQ technology. Then, differentially expressed proteins were validated by western blotting. Results: In total 354 proteins that satisfied the criteria for comparative proteomics study were identified. Of them, nine proteins were downregulated and 20 were up-regulated in liver mitochondria of PBC mouse model. Most differentially expressed proteins are associated with oxidation-reduction and lipid metabolism, and some are involved in the biosynthesis of steroid hormone and primary bile acid. Interestingly, four proteins (HCDH, CPT I, DECR, ECHDC2) involved in the fatty acid beta-oxidation were all upregulated. Conclusions: iTRAQ is a powerful tool for comparative proteomics study of PBC mouse model and differentially expressed proteins in mitochondria proteome of PBC mouse model provide insights for the pathogenesis mechanism at early stage of PBC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据