3.8 Article

Alterations to oxidative stress markers in dogs after a short-term stress during transport

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jns.2014.47

关键词

Alpha-tocopherol; Antioxidants; Canine nutrition; Lipoperoxidation; Thiobarbituric acid

资金

  1. OligoBasics Agroindustrial Ltda, Cascavel, Brazil
  2. Mogiana Alimentos (Guabi), Campinas, Brazil
  3. Mars Incorporated

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While methods to evaluate antioxidant capacity in animals exist, one problem with the models is induction of oxidative stress. It is necessary to promote a great enough challenge to induce measurable alterations to oxidative parameters while ensuring the protocol is compatible with animal welfare. The aim of the present study was to evaluate caged transport as a viable short-term stress that would significantly affect oxidative parameters. Twenty adult Beagle dogs, maintained on the same diet for 60 d prior to the transport, were included in the study. To simulate the stress, the dogs were housed in pairs in transport cages (1.0 m x 1.0 m x 1.5 m), placed on a truck coupled to a trailer and transported for a period of 15 min. Blood collection was performed immediately before and again 3 h after the transportation to evaluate oxidative parameters in blood serum, including thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), sequestration activity of the radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH.), protein carbonylation (PC), total sulfhydryl groups (SH), alpha-tocopherol (alpha Toc) and retinol (Ret). PC, SH and alpha Toc were not significantly changed in the study; however, TBARS, TAC and DPPH increased, whereas Ret decreased after the transport. Although the lack of a control group of dogs not submitted to transport is a limitation to be considered, we conclude that the transport model is effective in inducing an antioxidant response in dogs and relevant blood parameters show sensitivity to this proposed model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据