4.6 Article

Organo-mineral interactions in contrasting soils under natural vegetation

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2014.00002

关键词

sequential density fractionation; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; organic matter composition; mineralogy; clay minerals; soil organic matter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organo-mineral interactions are important for the cycling and preservation of organic carbon (OC) in soils. To understand the role of soil mineral surfaces in organo-mineral interactions, we used a sequential density fractionation procedure to isolate <1.6, 1.6-1.8, 1.8-2.0, 2.0-2.2, 2.2-2.6, and >2.6 g cm(-3) density fractions from topsoils (0-10 cm) of contrasting mineralogies. These soils were under natural vegetation of four major Australian soil types - Chromosol, Ferrosol, Sodosol, and Vertosol. The soils and their organic matter (OM) contents were found to be partitioned in four distinct pools: (i) particulate organic matter <1.6 g cm(-3); (ii) phyllosilicate dominant 1.8-2.2 g cm(-3); (iii) quartz and feldspar dominant >2.6 g cm(-3); and (iv) Fe oxides dominant >2.0 g cm(-3) (in the Ferrosol). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was used to investigate organic C and N bonding environments associated within each density fraction. Mineral pools were shown to be enriched in distinct organic functional groups: phyllosilicate dominant fractions were enriched with oxidized OC species (C-O, C=O, O=C-O) and protonated amide forms; quartz and feldspar dominated fractions were enriched in aliphatic C and protonated amide forms; Fe oxides dominant fractions had the greatest proportions of oxidized OC species and were low in protonated amide forms. The enrichment of different C species was related to the interaction of functional groups with the mineral surfaces. These results demonstrate the potential of mineral surfaces in influencing the chemical composition of OM bound in surfaces reactions and subsequently the stability of OM in organo-mineral interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据