4.2 Article

Photosynthetic gas exchange and antioxidative system in common bean plants infected by Colletotrichum lindemuthianum and supplied with silicon

期刊

TROPICAL PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 35-42

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1590/S1982-56762014000100005

关键词

Colletotrichum lindemuthianum; antioxidative enzymes; foliar disease; mineral nutrition; photosynthesis

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico-CNPq
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - CAPES
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais - FAPEMIG [APQ-01169-09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of silicon (Si) on the resistance of common bean plants to anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. The plants were grown in a nutrient solution containing 0 (control) or 2 mM Si (+ Si) and both photosynthesis and antioxidative metabolism levels were evaluated. The Si concentrations in the leaf tissues of + Si plants increased by 33% in comparison to those of control plants. Anthracnose severity was reduced by 34% in + Si plants in comparison to control plants. The net carbon assimilation rate, stomatal conductance to water vapor and transpiration rate values were significantly higher in + Si plants than in control plants. The activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and glutathione reductase (GR) tended to be higher in + Si plants than in control plants. The hydrogen peroxide concentration was significantly lower in + Si plants than in control plants. In conclusion, the Si supply was associated with lower anthracnose severity and up-regulation of antioxidant enzymes, which in turn might be associated with better gas exchange in + Si plants. The impaired photosynthetic performance in + Si plants was associated with stomatal limitations, whereas in control plants those impairments likely reflected dysfunctions at the level of biochemical reactions involved in CO2 fixation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据