4.8 Article

Metabolically normal obese people are protected from adverse effects following weight gain

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 125, 期 2, 页码 787-795

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI78425

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [UL1 RR024992, DK 56341, DK 37948, DK 20579, UL1 TR000450]
  2. Central Society for Clinical and Translational Research Early Career Development Award
  3. Longer Life Foundation the Kilo Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. Obesity is associated with insulin resistance and increased intrahepatic triglyceride (IHTG) content, both of which are key risk factors for diabetes and cardiovascular disease. However, a subset of obese people does not develop these metabolic complications. Here, we tested the hypothesis that people defined by IHTG content and insulin sensitivity as metabolically normal obese (MNO), but not those defined as metabolically abnormal obese (MAO), are protected from the adverse metabolic effects of weight gain. METHODS. Body composition, multiorgan insulin sensitivity, VLDL apolipoprotein B100 (apoB100) kinetics, and global transcriptional profile in adipose tissue were evaluated before and after moderate (similar to 6%) weight gain in MNO (n = 12) and MAO (n = 8) subjects with a mean BMI of 36 +/- 4 kg/m(2) who were matched for BMI and fat mass. RESULTS. Although the increase in body weight and fat mass was the same in both groups, hepatic, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue insulin sensitivity deteriorated, and VLDL apoB100 concentrations and secretion rates increased in MAO, but not MNO, subjects. Moreover, biological pathways and genes associated with adipose tissue lipogenesis increased in MNO, but not MAO, subjects. CONCLUSIONS. These data demonstrate that MNO people are resistant, whereas MAO people are predisposed, to the adverse metabolic effects of moderate weight gain and that increased adipose tissue capacity for lipogenesis might help protect MNO people from weight gain-induced metabolic dysfunction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据