3.8 Article

An approach for adaptive and integrated environmental planning to deal with uncertainty in a Great Barrier Reef Catchment

期刊

AUSTRALIAN PLANNER
卷 51, 期 3, 页码 243-259

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07293682.2013.837831

关键词

natural resources; Australia; management; environmental management; institutional arrange-ments; sugar cane

资金

  1. Australian Government
  2. programme through the Natural Heritage Trust
  3. Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management
  4. Commonwealth Department of Sustainability, Environment, Population and Communities, through the Great Barrier Reef National Environment Research Program administered by the Reef and Rainforest Research Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the Mossman Mill District Practices Framework. It was developed in the Wet Tropics region within the Great Barrier Reef in north-eastern Australia to describe the environmental benefits of agricultural management practices for the sugar cane industry. The framework translates complex, unclear and overlapping environmental plans, policy and legal arrangements into a simple framework of management practices that landholders can use to improve their management actions. Practices range from those that are old or outdated through to aspirational practices that have the potential to achieve desired resource condition targets. The framework has been applied by stakeholders at multiple scales to better coordinate and integrate a range of policy arrangements to improve natural resource management. It has been used to structure monitoring and evaluation in order to underpin a more adaptive approach to planning at mill district and property scale. Potentially, the framework and approach can be applied across fields of planning where adaptive management is needed. It has the potential to overcome many of the criticisms of property-scale and regional Natural Resource Management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据