4.8 Article

Co-clinical assessment identifies patterns of BRAF inhibitor resistance in melanoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 125, 期 4, 页码 1459-1470

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI78954

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Cancer Society Postdoctoral Fellowship [117842-PF-09-261-01-TBG]
  2. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [T32 CA009599]
  3. Adelson Medical Research Foundation
  4. NCI [U01 CA168394]
  5. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas [R1204]
  6. NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG) [P30 CA016672]
  7. NIH [1K08CA160692-01A1, P01CA163222-02, U54CA163125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple mechanisms have been described that confer BRAF inhibitor resistance to melanomas, yet the basis of this resistance remains undefined in a sizable portion of patient samples. Here, we characterized samples from a set of patients with melanoma that included individuals at baseline diagnosis, on BRAF inhibitor treatment, and with resistant tumors at both the protein and RNA levels. Using RNA and DNA sequencing, we identified known resistance-conferring mutations in 50% (6 of 12) of the resistant samples. In parallel, targeted proteomic analysis by protein array categorized the resistant samples into 3 stable groups, 2 of which were characterized by reactivation of MAPK signaling to different levels and 1 that was MAPK independent. The molecular relevance of these classifications identified in patients was supported by both mutation data and the similarity of resistance patterns that emerged during a co-clinical trial in a genetically engineered mouse (GEM) model of melanoma that recapitulates the development of BRAF inhibitor resistance. Additionally, we defined candidate biomarkers in pre- and early-treatment patient samples that have potential for predicting clinical responses. On the basis of these observations, we suggest that BRAF inhibitor-resistant melanomas can be actionably classified using protein expression patterns, even without identification of the underlying genetic alteration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据