3.9 Article

Denervation impairs regeneration of amputated zebrafish fins

期刊

BMC DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12861-014-0049-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. PhD grant from Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal
  2. ERC Reseal project [2007-StG-208631]
  3. FCT research grant [PTDC/SAU-GMG/101537/2008, PTDC/SAU-OBD/100200/2008, PTDC/BEX-BID/1176/2012]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/SAU-OBD/100200/2008, PTDC/SAU-GMG/101537/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Zebrafish are able to regenerate many of its tissues and organs after damage. In amphibians this process is regulated by nerve fibres present at the site of injury, which have been proposed to release factors into the amputated limbs/fins, promoting and sustaining the proliferation of blastemal cells. Although some candidate factors have been proposed to mediate the nerve dependency of regeneration, the molecular mechanisms involved in this process remain unclear. Results: We have used zebrafish as a model system to address the role of nerve fibres in fin regeneration. We have developed a protocol for pectoral fin denervation followed by amputation and analysed the regenerative process under this experimental conditions. Upon denervation fins were able to close the wound and form a wound epidermis, but could not establish a functional apical epithelial cap, with a posterior failure of blastema formation and outgrowth, and the accumulation of several defects. The expression patterns of genes known to be key players during fin regeneration were altered upon denervation, suggesting that nerves can contribute to the regulation of the Fgf, Wnt and Shh pathways during zebrafish fin regeneration. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that proper innervation of the zebrafish pectoral fin is essential for a successful regenerative process, and establish this organism as a useful model to understand the molecular and cellular mechanisms of nerve dependence, during vertebrate regeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据