4.8 Article

Mature T cell responses are controlled by microRNA-142

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 125, 期 7, 页码 2825-2840

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI78753

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-0173878, P30 CA046592, R01 CA173878, R01 CA143379, CA-143379] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL090775, HL-090775] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM007863] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

T cell proliferation is critical for immune responses; however, the molecular mechanisms that mediate the proliferative response are poorly understood. MicroRNAs (miRs) regulate various molecular processes, including development and function of the immune system. Here, utilizing multiple complementary genetic and molecular approaches, we investigated the contribution of a hematopoietic-specific miR, miR-142, in regulating T cell responses. T cell development was not affected in animals with a targeted deletion of Mir142; however, T cell proliferation was markedly reduced following stimulation both in vitro and in multiple murine models of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). miR-142-deficient T cells demonstrated substantial cell-cycling defects, and microarray and bioinformatics analyses revealed upregulation of genes involved in cell cycling. Moreover, 2 predicted miR-142 target genes, the atypical E2F transcription factors E2f7 and E2f8, were most highly upregulated in miR-142-deficient cells. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat interference-mediated (CRISPRi-mediated) silencing of E2F7 and E2F8 in miR-142-deficient T cells ameliorated cell-cycling defects and reduced GVHD, and overexpression of these factors in WT T cells inhibited the proliferative response. Together, these results identify a link between hematopoietic-specific miR-142 and atypical E2F transcription factors in the regulation of mature T cell cycling and suggest that targeting this interaction may be relevant for mitigating GVHD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据