4.8 Article

The AMPK-related kinase SNARK regulates muscle mass and myocyte survival

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 126, 期 2, 页码 560-570

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI79197

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [AR42238, DK068626, P30 DK036836, P30DK040561]
  2. Joslin Diabetes Center Diabetes Research Center [P30 DK36836]
  3. American Physiological Society (Physiological Genomics)
  4. Canadian Diabetes Association
  5. US Department of Agriculture (USDA) [58-1950-0014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The maintenance of skeletal muscle mass is critical for sustaining health; however, the mechanisms responsible for muscle loss with aging and chronic diseases, such as diabetes and obesity, are poorly understood. We found that expression of a member of the AMPK-related kinase family, the SNF1-AMPK-related kinase (SNARK, also known as NUAK2), increased with muscle cell differentiation. SNARK expression increased in skeletal muscles from young mice exposed to metabolic stress and in muscles from healthy older human subjects. The regulation of SNARK expression in muscle with differentiation and physiological stress suggests that SNARK may function in the maintenance of muscle mass. Consistent with this hypothesis, decreased endogenous SNARK expression (using siRNA) in cultured muscle cells resulted in increased apoptosis and decreased cell survival under conditions of metabolic stress. Likewise, muscle-specific transgenic animals expressing a SNARK dominant-negative inactive mutant (SDN) had increased myonuclear apoptosis and activation of apoptotic mediators in muscle. Moreover, animals expressing SDN had severe, age-accelerated muscle atrophy and increased adiposity, consistent with sarcopenic obesity. Reduced SNARK activity, in vivo and in vitro, caused downregulation of the Rho kinase signaling pathway, a key mediator of cell survival. These findings reveal a critical role for SNARK in myocyte survival and the maintenance of muscle mass with age.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据