4.3 Article

Anticipatory life-cycle assessment for responsible research and innovation

期刊

JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION
卷 1, 期 2, 页码 200-207

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2014.920121

关键词

anticipation; technology assessment; foresight; knowledge integration

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1140190, 1144616]
  2. Center for Nanotechnology in Society (CNS) at ASU [0531194, 0937591]
  3. NSF
  4. Department of Energy (DOE) Quantum Energy and Sustainable Solar Technologies (QESST) Engineering Research Center at ASU [1041895]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The goal of guiding innovation toward beneficial social and environmental outcomes - referred to in the growing literature as responsible research and innovation (RRI) - is intuitively worthwhile but lacks practicable tools for implementation. One potentially useful tool is life-cycle assessment (LCA), which is a comprehensive framework used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products, processes, and technologies. However, LCA ineffectively promotes RRI for at least two reasons: (1) Codified approaches to LCA are largely retrospective, relying heavily on data collected from mature industries with existing supply chains and (2) LCA underemphasizes the importance of stakeholder engagement to inform critical modeling decisions which diminishes the social credibility and relevance of results. LCA researchers have made piecemeal advances that address these shortcomings, yet there is no consensus regarding how to advance LCA to support RRI of emerging technologies. This paper advocates for development of anticipatory LCA as non-predictive and inclusive of uncertainty, which can be used to explore both reasonable and extreme-case scenarios of future environmental burdens associated with an emerging technology. By identifying the most relevant uncertainties and engaging research and development decision-makers, such anticipatory methods can generate alternative research agenda and provide a practicable tool to promote environmental RRI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据