4.4 Article

Predictive factors for pacemaker requirement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

期刊

BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-12-87

关键词

TAVI; AV block; Left bundle branch block; Pacemaker; His bundle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been established as a treatment option for inoperable patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. However, patients suffer frequently from conduction disturbances after TAVI. Methods: Baseline, procedural as well as surface and intracardiac ECG parameters were evaluated for patients treated with TAVI and a comparison between patients requiring pacemaker with those not suffering from relevant conduction disorders were done. Results: TAVI was successfully in all patients (n=45). Baseline surface and intracardiac ECG recording revealed longer PQ (197.1 +/- 51.2 msec versus 154.1 +/- 32.1 msec; p<0.001), longer AH (153.6 +/- 43.4 msec versus 116.1 +/- 31.2 msec; p<0.001) and HV interval (81.7 +/- 17.8 msec versus 56.8 +/- 8.5 msec; p<0.001) in patients with need for a pacemaker (n=23) versus control group (n=22); furthermore, 7-day follow-up analysis showed a higher prevalence of new left bundle branch block (LBBB) (87.0% versus 31.9%; p<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that only new LBBB, QRS duration >120 msec and a PQ interval >200 msec immediately (within 60 minutes) after implantation of the aortic valve were predictors for high-grade (type II second-degree and third-degree) AV block. Other clinical parameters as well as baseline electrocardiographic parameters had no impact on critical conduction delay. Conclusion: Cardiac conduction disturbances are common after TAVI. The need for pacing after TAVI is predictable by surface ECG evaluation immediately (within 60 minutes) after the procedure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据