4.6 Article

Inclusion of KI67 significantly improves performance of the PREDICT prognostication and prediction model for early breast cancer

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-908

关键词

Breast cancer; KI67; Prognostic model

类别

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK [C490/A10124]
  2. UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the University of Cambridge
  3. Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) [AMS-SGCL11-Ali] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Cancer Research UK [16942, 16561] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Cancer Research UK
  6. The Francis Crick Institute [10124] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2013-14-006, NF-SI-0611-10154] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: PREDICT (www.predict.nhs.uk) is a prognostication and treatment benefit tool for early breast cancer (EBC). The aim of this study was to incorporate the prognostic effect of KI67 status in a new version (v3), and compare performance with the Predict model that includes HER2 status (v2). Methods: The validation study was based on 1,726 patients with EBC treated in Nottingham between 1989 and 1998. KI67 positivity for PREDICT is defined as >10% of tumour cells staining positive. ROC curves were constructed for Predict models with (v3) and without (v2) KI67 input. Comparison was made using the method of DeLong. Results: In 1274 ER+ patients the predicted number of events at 10 years increased from 196 for v2 to 204 for v3 compared to 221 observed. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) improved from 0.7611 to 0.7676 (p = 0.005) in ER+ patients and from 0.7546 to 0.7595 (p = 0.0008) in all 1726 patients (ER+ and ER-). Conclusion: Addition of KI67 to PREDICT has led to a statistically significant improvement in the model performance for ER+ patients and will aid clinical decision making in these patients. Further studies should determine whether other markers including gene expression profiling provide additional prognostic information to that provided by PREDICT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据