4.6 Article

Inhibition of long non-coding RNA NEAT1 impairs myeloid differentiation in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-693

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81400102]
  2. Guangdong Science & Technology Project [2012B050600023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is characterized by the reciprocal translocation t(15; 17), which fuses PML with retinoic acid receptor alpha (RAR alpha). Although PML-RAR alpha is crucially important for pathogenesis and responsiveness to treatment, the molecular and cellular mechanisms by which PML-RAR alpha exerts its oncogenic potential have not been fully elucidated. Recent reports have suggested that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) contribute to the precise control of gene expression and are involved in human diseases. Little is known about the role of lncRNA in APL. Methods: We analyzed NEAT1 expression in APL samples and cell lines by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR). The expression of PML-RAR alpha was measured by Western blot. Cell differentiation was assessed by measuring the surface CD11b antigen expression by flow cytometry analysis. Results: We found that nuclear enriched abundant transcript 1 (NEAT1), a lncRNA essential for the formation of nuclear body paraspeckles, is significantly repressed in de novo APL samples compared with those of healthy donors. We further provide evidence that NEAT1 expression was repressed by PML-RAR alpha. Furthermore, significant NEAT1 upregulation was observed during all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA)-induced NB4 cell differentiation. Finally, we demonstrate the importance of NEAT1 in myeloid differentiation. We show that reduction of NEAT1 by small interfering RNA (siRNA) blocks ATRA-induced differentiation. Conclusions: Our results indicate that reduced expression of the nuclear long noncoding RNA NEAT1 may play a role in the myeloid differentiation of APL cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据