4.6 Article

Radiation-induced temporal lobe injury after intensity modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a dose-volume-outcome analysis

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-397

关键词

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Temporal lobe injury; Intensity modulated radiotherapy; Radiation volume effect; Dose tolerance

类别

资金

  1. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme
  2. Science Foundation of Key Hospital Clinical Program of Ministry of Health of P. R. China [2010-178]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81071836]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: To identify the radiation volume effect and significant dosimetric parameters for temporal lobe injury (TLI) and determine the radiation dose tolerance of the temporal lobe (TL) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Methods: Twenty NPC patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-diagnosed unilateral TLI were reviewed. Dose-volume data was retrospectively analyzed. Results: Paired samples t-tests showed all dosimetric parameters significantly correlated with TLI, except the TL volume (TLV) and V-75 (the TLV that received >= 75 Gy, P = 0.73 and 0.22, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed V-10 and V-20 (P = 0.552 and 0.11, respectively) were the only non-significant predictors from V-10 to V-70 for TLI. D-0.5cc (dose to 0.5 ml of the TLV) was an independent predictor for TLI (P < 0.001) in multivariate analysis; the area under the ROC curve for D-0.5cc was 0.843 (P < 0.001), and the cutoff point 69 Gy was deemed as the radiation dose limit. The distribution of high dose 'hot spot' regions and the location of TLI were consistent. Conclusions: A D-0.5cc of 69 Gy may be the dose tolerance of the TL. The risk of TLI was highly dependent on high dose 'hot spots' in the TL; physicians should be cautious of such 'hot spots' in the TL during IMRT treatment plan optimization, review and approval.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据