4.6 Article

SOX2 expression correlates with lymph-node metastases and distant spread in right-sided colon cancer

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-518

关键词

SOX2; beta-catenin; Colon cancer; Metastasis

类别

资金

  1. Manfred Stolte-Stiftung, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The transcription factor SOX2, which is involved in the induction of pluripotent stem cells and contributes to colorectal carcinogenesis, is associated with a poor prognosis in colon cancer (CC). Furthermore, SOX2 is a repressor of the transcriptional activity of beta-catenin in vitro. Since the majority of CC develop via an activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway, indicated by nuclear expression of beta-catenin, we wanted to investigate the expression patterns of SOX2 and beta-catenin and correlate them with the occurrence of lymph node and distant metastases as indicators of malignant progression. Methods: The expression of SOX2 and beta-catenin was investigated in a case control study utilizing a matched pair collection (N = 114) of right-sided CCs with either corresponding distant metastases (N = 57) or without distant spread (N = 57) by applying immunohistochemistry. Results: Elevated protein expression of SOX2 significantly correlated with the presence of lymph node (p = 0.006) and distant metastases (p = 0.022). Nuclear beta-catenin expression correlated significantly only with distant metastases (p = 0.001). Less than 10% of cases showed a coexpression of high levels of beta-catenin and SOX2. The positivity for both markers was also associated with a very high risk for lymph-node metastases (p = 0.007) and distant spread (p = 0.028). Conclusion: We demonstrated that increased expression of either SOX2 or nuclear beta-catenin are associated with distant metastases in right-sided CC. Additionally, SOX2 is also associated with lymph-node metastases. These data underline the importance of stemness-associated markers for the identification of CC with high risk for distant spread.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据