4.6 Article

Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel and capecitabine in patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-385

关键词

paclitaxel; capecitabine; squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Center of Korea [05101403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: This phase II study assessed the response rate and toxicity profile of weekly paclitaxel and capecitabine in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed SCCE were treated with paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 plus capecitabine 900 mg/m(2) orally twice a day on days 1-14. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Between 2006 and 2009, 32 patients were enrolled. Twelve patients were chemotherapy-naive. Twenty patients had received prior chemotherapy including platinum-based regimens. Patients received a median of 5 cycles of treatment (range, 1-12). The response rate was 75% (95% CI; 50.5 similar to 99.5%) in the first-line and 45% (95% CI; 26.9 similar to 73.1%) in the second-line. With a median follow-up of 20.7 months, median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 6.4) for all patients and median overall survival (OS) was 11.7 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 18.0) for all patients. The median OS was 14.3 months (95% CI, 10.6 to 18.0) for patients receiving therapy as 1(st) line and 8.4 months (95% CI, 6.6 to 10.1) for those receiving as 2(nd)-line therapy. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 53.3% of the patients, which was the most common cause of dose reduction. G3 non-hematologic toxicity included stomatitis (9.4%), asthenia (6.3%), and hand-foot skin reaction (3.1%). Conclusions: Weekly paclitaxel and capecitabine is a highly active and well-tolerated regimen in patients with metastatic or recurrent SCCE in the first-line as well as second-line setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据