4.8 Article

Uncovering by Atomic Force Microscopy of an original circular structure at the yeast cell surface in response to heat shock

期刊

BMC BIOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-12-6

关键词

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM); Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Heat-shock; Cell wall; Chitin; Budding

类别

资金

  1. ANR young scientist program (AFMYST project) [ANR-11-JSV5-001-01, SD 30024331]
  2. Region Midi Pyrenees [10051296]
  3. Direction Generale de l'Armement (DGA)
  4. Lallemand SAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Atomic Force Microscopy ( AFM) is a polyvalent tool that allows biological and mechanical studies of full living microorganisms, and therefore the comprehension of molecular mechanisms at the nanoscale level. By combining AFM with genetical and biochemical methods, we explored the biophysical response of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to a temperature stress from 30 degrees C to 42 degrees C during 1 h. Results: We report for the first time the formation of an unprecedented circular structure at the cell surface that takes its origin at a single punctuate source and propagates in a concentric manner to reach a diameter of 2-3 mu m at least, thus significantly greater than a bud scar. Concomitantly, the cell wall stiffness determined by the Young's Modulus of heat stressed cells increased two fold with a concurrent increase of chitin. This heat-induced circular structure was not found either in wsc1 Delta or bck1 Delta mutants that are defective in the CWI signaling pathway, nor in chs1 Delta, chs3 Delta and bni1 Delta mutant cells, reported to be deficient in the proper budding process. It was also abolished in the presence of latrunculin A, a toxin known to destabilize actin cytoskeleton. Conclusions: Our results suggest that this singular morphological event occurring at the cell surface is due to a dysfunction in the budding machinery caused by the heat shock and that this phenomenon is under the control of the CWI pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据