4.7 Article

An interval fuzzy chance-constrained programming model for sustainable urban land-use planning and land use policy analysis

期刊

LAND USE POLICY
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 479-491

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.002

关键词

Uncertainty; Sustainable land-use allocation; Interval fuzzy chance-constrained model; Land use policy; Environmental management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an interval fuzzy chance-constrained land-use allocation (IFCC-LUA) model is developed for sustainable urban land-use planning management and land use policy analysis under uncertainty. This method is based on an integration of interval parameter programming (IPP), fuzzy flexible linear programming (FFLP) and chance-constrained programming (CCP) techniques. Complexities in land-use planning management system can be systematically reflected, thus applicability of the modeling process can be highly enhanced. The developed method is applied to planning land-use allocation practice in Nanjing city, China. The objective of the IFCC-LUA is maximizing net benefit from LUA system and the main constraints include investment constraints, land suitability constraints, water/power consumption constraints and wastewater/solid waste capacity constraints. Modeling results indicate that desired system benefit will be between [1.34, 1.74] x 10(12) yuan under the minimum violating probabilities; the optimized areas of commercial land, industrial land, agricultural land, transportation land, residential land, water land, green land, landfill land and unused land will be [290, 393] hm(2), 1176, 238] hm(2), [3245, 4390] hm(2), [126, 170] hm(2), [49, 661 hm(2), [1241, 1679] hm(2), [102, 138] hm2, [7, 10] hm(2) and [178, 241] hm(2). They can be used for generating decision alternatives and thus help decision makers identify desired land use policies under various system-reliability constraints of economic development requirement and environmental capacity of pollutant. Tradeoffs between system benefits and constraint violation risks can also be tackled. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据