4.6 Article

Enhancing protein-vitamin binding residues prediction by multiple heterogeneous subspace SVMs ensemble

期刊

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-297

关键词

Protein-vitamin binding residue; Feature subspace; Heterogeneous SVM; Classifier ensemble

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61373062, 61175024, 61222306, 61100116, 61233011]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu [BK20141403]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M530260, 2014T70526]
  4. The Six Top Talents of Jiangsu Province [2013-XXRJ-022]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30920130111010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Vitamins are typical ligands that play critical roles in various metabolic processes. The accurate identification of the vitamin-binding residues solely based on a protein sequence is of significant importance for the functional annotation of proteins, especially in the post-genomic era, when large volumes of protein sequences are accumulating quickly without being functionally annotated. Results: In this paper, a new predictor called TargetVita is designed and implemented for predicting protein-vitamin binding residues using protein sequences. In TargetVita, features derived from the position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM), predicted protein secondary structure, and vitamin binding propensity are combined to form the original feature space; then, several feature subspaces are selected by performing different feature selection methods. Finally, based on the selected feature subspaces, heterogeneous SVMs are trained and then ensembled for performing prediction. Conclusions: The experimental results obtained with four separate vitamin-binding benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed TargetVita is superior to the state-of-the-art vitamin-specific predictor, and an average improvement of 10% in terms of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) was achieved over independent validation tests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据