4.7 Review

Prediction of genetic interactions using machine learning and network properties

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00172

关键词

genetic interactions; machine learning; prediction; cancer; drug discovery; network analysis

资金

  1. Tri-Institutional PhD Program in Computational Biology and Medicine [1T32GM083937]
  2. NSF
  3. LLS SCOR
  4. Hirschl Trust Award
  5. Starr Cancer Consortium [I6-A618]
  6. NIH [1R01CA194547, R01GM114434, U54OD020353, 1U01HL107388]
  7. IBM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A genetic interaction (GI) is a type of interaction where the effect of one gene is modified by the effect of one or several other genes. These interactions are important for delineating functional relationships among genes and their corresponding proteins, as well as elucidating complex biological processes and diseases. An important type of GI - synthetic sickness or synthetic lethality - involves two or more genes, where the loss of either gene alone has little impact on cell viability, but the combined loss of all genes leads to a severe decrease in fitness (sickness) or cell death (lethality). The identification of GIs is an important problem for it can help delineate pathways, protein complexes, and regulatory dependencies. Synthetic lethal interactions have important clinical and biological significance, such as providing therapeutically exploitable weaknesses in tumors. While near systematic high-content screening for GIs is possible in single cell organisms such as yeast, the systematic discovery of GIs is extremely difficult in mammalian cells. Therefore, there is a great need for computational approaches to reliably predict GIs, including synthetic lethal interactions, in these organisms. Here, we review the state-of-the-art approaches, strategies, and rigorous evaluation methods for learning and predicting GIs, both under general (healthy/standard laboratory) conditions and under specific contexts, such as diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据