4.4 Article

Effect of combined multiple contexts and multiple stimuli exposure in spider phobia: A randomized clinical trial in virtual reality

期刊

BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY
卷 71, 期 -, 页码 45-53

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.05.014

关键词

Multiple contexts; Multiple stimuli; Return of fear; Spider phobia; Virtual reality exposure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Our previous study indicated that treatment in multiple contexts (MC) improved the outcome of exposure treatment by reducing return of fear. This effect was evident when the test was conducted immediately post treatment. In the present study, we conducted a treatment analogue study where we investigated whether an exposure to multiple stimuli (MS) and a combination of both MS and MC would further improve treatment efficacy in the short and long terms. Method: Spider-phobic patients (N = 58) were randomly allocated to one of four groups. Each group received virtual reality (VR) exposure treatment in either one or four different contexts and was exposed to either one or four different spiders. All participants completed both a VR test with a novel spider in a novel context and an in vivo behavioral avoidance test (BAT) pre-, post-treatment and at follow-up. Results: Short-term but not long-term return of fear was attenuated by multiple context exposure in VR. Long-term effect of fear attenuation was observed only in the MS single context group. In the BAT, the multiple stimuli condition seemed to be more beneficial in both the short and long term. Notably, there was no evidence for superiority of the combined multiple stimuli and contexts condition. Conclusion: Change of contexts during exposure significantly reduced return of fear post treatment; however, similar results could not be observed with a follow-up test. The implementation of multiple stimuli during exposure seems to have both short-term and long-lasting beneficial effects on the treatment outcome. We recommend further investigation of this phenomenon and introduce further possible improvements to our paradigm. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据