4.6 Article

Elevation change of the Greenland Ice Sheet due to surface mass balance and firn processes, 1960-2014

期刊

CRYOSPHERE
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 2009-2025

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/tc-9-2009-2015

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Polar Programme (NPP) of the Netherlands Institute for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. Det Frie Forskningsrad [4002-00234]
  3. Geocenter Denmark

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Observed changes in the surface elevation of the Greenland Ice Sheet are caused by ice dynamics, basal elevation change, basal melt, surface mass balance (SMB) variability, and by compaction of the overlying firn. The last two contributions are quantified here using a firn model that includes compaction, meltwater percolation, and refreezing. The model is forced with surface mass fluxes and temperature from a regional climate model for the period 1960-2014. The model results agree with observations of surface density, density profiles from 62 firn cores, and altimetric observations from regions where ice-dynamical surface height changes are likely small. In areas with strong surface melt, the firn model overestimates density. We find that the firn layer in the high interior is generally thickening slowly (15 cm yr(-1)). In the percolation and ablation areas, firn and SMB processes account for a surface elevation lowering of up to 20-50 cm yr(-1). Most of this firn-induced marginal thinning is caused by an increase in melt since the mid-1990s and partly compensated by an increase in the accumulation of fresh snow around most of the ice sheet. The total firn and ice volume change between 1980 and 2014 is estimated at -3295 +/- 1030 km(3) due to firn and SMB changes, corresponding to an ice-sheet average thinning of 1.96 +/- 0.61 m. Most of this volume decrease occurred after 1995. The computed changes in surface elevation can be used to partition altimetrically observed volume change into surface mass balance and ice-dynamically related mass changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据