4.6 Article

Enhanced photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic performance of iodine-doped titania nanotube arrays

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 5, 期 62, 页码 50379-50391

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra08407e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Polish National Science Center [2012/07/D/ST5/02269]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper discusses the synthesis and performance of iodine doped titania nanotube arrays exhibited under irradiation. The doping procedure was performed as an additional, electrochemical process carried out after formation of nanotube arrays via anodization of the Ti substrate. The optical and structural properties were characterized using Raman, UV-vis, photoluminescence and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The surface morphology and cross-section studies performed by means of scanning electron microscopy show that the ordered tubular architecture is not influenced by the doping method. However, iodine doping causes a reduction of bandgap energy and photoluminescence intensity. The nanotubular TiO2 electrodes have been monitored by electrochemical (using cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy) and in situ UV-vis spectroelectrochemical measurements in contact with an aqueous electrolyte. Collected results show significant differences in electrochemical activity between pure and doped titania exhibited as i.e. change of Mott-Schottky relation or shift in the onset potential when a decrease in reflectance is initiated. The photocurrent density reached 155.2 and 142.2 mu A cm(-2) for iodine doped materials when KI and HIO4 were used as iodine precursors whereas only 25.6 mu A cm(-2) was registered for pure titania nanotubes under UV-vis illumination. Moreover, doped samples are far more efficient for the photodegradation progress than undoped material leading to decomposition of over 70% of methylene blue used as a model organic pollutant. The reported studies demonstrate for the first time the detailed optical, electrochemical and photoelectrochemical studies of iodine doped nanotube arrays.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据