4.4 Article

Inhibition of the expression on MMP-2, 9 and morphological changes via human fibrosarcoma cell line by 6,6′-bieckol from marine alga Ecklonia cava

期刊

BMB REPORTS
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 62-68

出版社

KOREAN SOCIETY BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.5483/BMBRep.2010.43.1.062

关键词

Activator protein-1 (AP-1); Ecklonia cava (EC); Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs); Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B); 6,6 '-bieckol

资金

  1. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime, Republic of Korea
  2. Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST) [20046002] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [핵09B2519] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Matrix Metal loproteinases (MMPs) are a family of zinc-endopeptidases which can degrade extracellular matrix (ECM) components and play important roles in a variety of biological and pathological processes. 6,6'-bieckol isolated and characterized from an edible marine brown alga Ecklonia cava (EC), according to the comprehensive spectral analysis of MS and NMR data. Here the influence of 6,6'-bieckol on expressions of MMPs was examined by zymography and western blot analysis via human fibrosarcoma cell line (HT1080). It is shown that 6,6'-bieckol significantly down regulated the expressions of MMP-2 and -9 in dose-dependent manner. The influence of 6,6'-bieckol on the cell viability and cell behavior of HT1080 cells were also investigated, our dates shown that it suppressed the migration and 313 culture in HT1080 cells. Meanwhile, we explored several signal pathways which may contribute to this process, and found the suppressing of MMPs expressions in HT1080 cells might be due to the suppression of NF-kappa B signal pathway. [BMB reports 2010; 43(1): 62-68]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据