4.5 Review

Molecular biology of mantle cell lymphoma: From profiling studies to new therapeutic strategies

期刊

BLOOD REVIEWS
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 205-216

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2009.03.001

关键词

Mantle cell lymphoma; Genomic profiling; Therapeutic targets

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Saniclad y Consumo, Spain [PI060371]
  2. Programa Ramon y Cajal, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  3. Direccio General de R+D+I
  4. Junta de Balears-AECC
  5. Fundacio Internacional josep Carreras-Fundacion Caja Madrid [FIJC-08/ESP-FCA-JAMADRID]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a well-defined lymphoid malignancy characterized by a rapid clinical evolution and poor response to current therapeutic protocols. The hallmark genetic alteration of MCL is the t(11;14)(q13;32) chromosomal translocation that leads to the overexpression of cyclin D1. Recently, new molecular alterations of major importance in the pathogenic mechanisms of this disease have been discovered, and have revealed the biological heterogeneity of MCL. The first section of our review discusses our current understanding of the molecular biology of this entity according to recent information from comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and expression profiling studies, which are leading to the identification of several druggable targets. In the second section we revise new therapeutic strategies based on new drug families that target key molecular pathways of major relevance in this malignancy. We analyze emerging agents that are already producing significant results in different models of human cancers, including MCL. Based on the current knowledge and recent studies, we suggest that the encouraging results described here should provide a rationale platform for the design of new treatments that may overcome the resistance of this aggressive lymphoma to conventional therapy and improve patient prognosis. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据