4.0 Article

Age and the difference between awake ambulatory blood pressure and office blood pressure: a meta-analysis

期刊

BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 159-167

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328346d603

关键词

awake blood pressure; home blood pressure; meta-analysis; office blood pressure

资金

  1. NHLBI [R24 HL76857, PO1 HL47540]
  2. Mitsubishi Pharma Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) (ABP) is a better predictor of adverse cardiovascular events than office BP (OBP). Owing to the extensive literature on the 'white coat effect', it is widely believed that ABP tends to be lower than OBP, with statements to this effect in Joint National Committee VII. However, recent evidence suggests that the difference varies systematically with age. Methods We searched PubMed to identify population studies, published before April 2009, which assessed OBP and either ABP or home BP (HBP). On account of significant heterogeneity in the outcomes, random effect models were used for the meta-analyses. Results OBP increased with age more steeply than awake ABP. OBP became higher than awake systolic/diastolic ABP at the age of 51.3/42.7 years in men (13 studies, N = 3562) and 51.9/42.3 years in women (11 studies, N = 2585). In the data in which OBP and HBP were measured (eight studies, N = 4916), OBP was higher than HBP at all ages. In the data in which OBP, awake ABP, and HBP were all measured (two studies, N = 895), awake ABP was higher than HBP at younger ages, becoming similar at the older age. Conclusion OBP tends to be higher than awake ABP only after the age of 50 years for systolic and after the age of 45 years for diastolic BP, but is lower than ABP at younger ages; in contrast OBP tends to exceed HBP at all ages. Blood Press Monit 16: 159-167 (C) 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据