3.8 Article

Digital citizenship through game design in Minecraft

期刊

NEW LIBRARY WORLD
卷 116, 期 7-8, 页码 369-382

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/NLW-09-2014-0112

关键词

Information literacy; Virtual worlds; Game design; Digital citizenship; Minecraft; Technology clubs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - This study aims to describe a library project exploring innovative options for embedding information literacy skills in the elementary school library by utilizing Minecraft, a virtual world three-dimensional (3D) building game environment. Design/methodology/approach - The small-scale descriptive study, with a follow-up survey, focuses on a group of fifth-grade students in an after-school technology club facilitated by the school librarian. The students designed and built a 3D virtual world library game for younger students to help them learn digital citizenship and information literacy. Findings - Analysis of observations, interviews and videos indicated that students were highly engaged in learning information literacy elements throughout all stages of the project from design, building, implementation and testing of younger students. Research limitations/implications - Although the small number of students enrolled in the club is a limitation, the feedback provided strong evidence of motivation for learning through gamification. Further research could assess learning outcomes with the curriculum, specifically for digital citizenship and information literacy. Practical implications - Embedding information literacy into a 3D world allows students to learn computer code, mathematics, game design, and fosters collaboration while demonstrating digital citizenship. Social implications - Game design requires teamwork, a real-life skill essential for students entering the work force. Originality/value - Few articles share student-designed solutions of critical information literacy needs. This study exemplifies constructivist learning in a gaming environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据