4.0 Article

Comparisons of the fibrin networks during pregnancy, nonpregnancy and pregnancy during dysfibrinogenaemia using the scanning electron microscope

期刊

BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 12-16

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e328322b429

关键词

dysfibrinogenaemia; fibrin networks; pregnancy; scanning electron microscopy

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF) [FA2004033100004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In normal pregnancy there is an increase in procoagulant activity. Furthermore, the fibrinolytic activity is impaired and remains low during labor and delivery, but returns rapidly to normal, following delivery. Here, we show ultrastructural changes in fibrin networks found in pregnant individuals and nonpregnant individuals. Typically thick, major fibers, and irregularly placed thin, minor fibers are present in healthy, nonpregnant individuals. In this qualitative assessment, changes in fibrin networks and platelet morphology were studied with scanning electron microscopy in healthy individuals, a healthy individual at 30-week pregnancy and post partum. We also included results from an individual with dysfibrinogenaemia (30-week pregnant and postpartum). Results suggest that in the healthy pregnant and pregnant dysfibrinogenaemia individuals, the minor, thin fibers form a fine, dense net distributed evenly over the major fibers. This net was not present in the nonpregnant dysfibrinogenaemia or healthy nonpregnant individuals. No ultrastructural changes were found in platelet morphology. These morphological changes seen during pregnancy might contribute to increased thrombotic risk because, due to the denser appearance of fibrin networks because of the fine minor network morphology during pregnancy, clots might take longer to be broken down by normal fibrinolytic activity. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 20:12-16 (C) 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据