4.7 Article

Clonal evolution and clinical correlates of somatic mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms

期刊

BLOOD
卷 123, 期 14, 页码 2220-2228

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-537167

关键词

-

资金

  1. Gebert Ruf Foundation
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [310000-120724/1, 32003BB_135712/1]
  3. Else Kroner-Fresenius Foundation
  4. Swiss Cancer League [KLS-02398-02-2009]
  5. University of Basel
  6. Austrian Science Fund [FWF4702-B20]
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [32003BB_135712] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a group of clonal disorders characterized by aberrant hematopoietic proliferation and an increased tendency toward leukemic transformation. We used targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 104 genes to detect somatic mutations in a cohort of 197 MPN patients and followed clonal evolution and the impact on clinical outcome. Mutations in calreticulin (CALR) were detected using a sensitive allele-specific polymerase chain reaction. We observed somatic mutations in 90% of patients, and 37% carried somatic mutations other than JAK2 V617F and CALR. The presence of 2 or more somatic mutations significantly reduced overall survival and increased the risk of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia. In particular, somatic mutations with loss of heterozygosity in TP53 were strongly associated with leukemic transformation. We used NGS to follow and quantitate somatic mutations in serial samples from MPN patients. Surprisingly, the number of mutations between early and late patient samples did not significantly change, and during a total follow-up of 133 patient years, only 2 new mutations appeared, suggesting that the mutation rate in MPN is rather low. Our data show that comprehensive mutational screening at diagnosis and during follow-up has considerable potential to identify patients at high risk of disease progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据