4.7 Article Data Paper

Filling the gaps in meteorological continuous data measured at FLUXNET sites with ERA-Interim reanalysis

期刊

EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 157-171

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/essd-7-157-2015

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy, Biological and Environmental Research, Terrestrial Carbon Program [DE-FG02-04ER63917, DE-FG02-04ER63911]
  2. CFCAS
  3. NSERC
  4. BIOCAP
  5. Environment Canada
  6. NRCan
  7. CarboEuropeIP
  8. FAO-GTOS-TCO
  9. iLEAPS
  10. Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
  11. National Science Foundation
  12. University of Tuscia
  13. Universite Laval
  14. US Department of Energy
  15. GeoCarbon EU project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exchanges of carbon, water and energy between the land surface and the atmosphere are monitored by eddy covariance technique at the ecosystem level. Currently, the FLUXNET database contains more than 500 registered sites, and up to 250 of them share data (free fair-use data set). Many modelling groups use the FLUXNET data set for evaluating ecosystem models' performance, but this requires uninterrupted time series for the meteorological variables used as input. Because original in situ data often contain gaps, from very short (few hours) up to relatively long (some months) ones, we develop a new and robust method for filling the gaps in meteorological data measured at site level. Our approach has the benefit of making use of continuous data available globally (ERA-Interim) and a high temporal resolution spanning from 1989 to today. These data are, however, not measured at site level, and for this reason a method to downscale and correct the ERA-Interim data is needed. We apply this method to the level 4 data (L4) from the La Thuile collection, freely available after registration under a fair-use policy. The performance of the developed method varies across sites and is also function of the meteorological variable. On average over all sites, applying the bias correction method to the ERA-Interim data reduced the mismatch with the in situ data by 10 to 36%, depending on the meteorological variable considered. In comparison to the internal variability of the in situ data, the root mean square error (RMSE) between the in situ data and the unbiased ERA-I (ERA-Interim) data remains relatively large (on average over all sites, from 27 to 76% of the standard deviation of in situ data, depending on the meteorological variable considered). The performance of the method remains poor for the wind speed field, in particular regarding its capacity to conserve a standard deviation similar to the one measured at FLUXNET stations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据