Antiapoptotic potency of Bcl-2 proteins primarily relies on their stability, not binding selectivity

All 6 human prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins can drive cancer development and contribute to therapy resistance. However, their relative abilities to protect cells against cancer therapy were not examined previously. We report that Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, or Bcl-w consistently protected leukemic cells better than Bcl-B, Bfl-1, or Mcl-1 against a wide variety of anticancer regimens. Current thinking would attribute this to differences in their ability to bind to BH3-only proteins, Bax, and Bak. To address this, we established the first complete, quantitative cellular interaction profile of all human prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins with all their proapoptotic relatives. Binding was unexpectedly promiscuous, except for Bad and Noxa, and did not explain the differential antiapoptotic capacity of the Bcl-2 proteins. Rather, Bcl-B, Bfl-1, or Mcl-1 proved less potent due to steady-state or drug-induced proteasomal degradation. All 6 Bcl-2 proteins similarly protected against the diverse anticancer regimens when expressed at equal protein levels, in agreement with their broad interaction profile. Therefore, clinical diagnostics should include all family members and should be performed at the protein rather than at the messenger RNA level. In drug development, targeting the ubiquitination machinery of prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins will complement and potentially improve on targeting Bcl-2 protein interactions with BH3 mimetics.