4.7 Article

Persistence of minimal residual disease in bone marrow predicts outcome in follicular lymphomas treated with a rituximab-intensive program

期刊

BLOOD
卷 122, 期 23, 页码 3759-3766

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-507319

关键词

-

资金

  1. Roche Italy SPA
  2. Progetto di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale from Ministero Italiano dell'Universita e della Ricerca [7.07.02.60 AE01]
  3. Progetti di Ricerca Finalizzata [7.07.08.60 P49, RF-2009-1469205]
  4. Progetto di Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata [7.07.08.60 P51, RF-2010-2307262]
  5. Fondi di Ricerca Locale, Universita degli Studi di Torino
  6. Fondazione Neoplasie del Sangue, Torino

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We assessed the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) within the ML17638 phase 3 trial from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi, investigating the role of rituximab maintenance in elderly follicular lymphoma (FL) patients after a brief first-line chemoimmunotherapy. MRD for the bcl-2/IgH translocation was determined on bone marrow cells in a centralized laboratory belonging to the Euro-MRD consortium, using qualitative and quantitative polymerase chain reactions (PCRs). Of 234 enrolled patients, 227 (97%) were screened at diagnosis. A molecular marker (MM) was found in 51%. Patients with an MM were monitored at 8 subsequent times. Of the 675 expected follow-up samples, 83% were analyzed. Conversion to PCR negativity predicted better progression-free survival (PFS) at all post-treatment times (eg, end of therapy: 3-year PFS, 72% vs 39%; P < .007). MRD was predictive in both maintenance (83% vs 60%; P < .007) and observation (71% vs 50%; P < .001) groups. PCR positivity at the end of induction was an independent adverse predictor (hazard ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-7.07). MRD is a powerful independent outcome predictor in FL patients who receive rituximab-intensive programs, suggesting a need to investigate its value for decision-making. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrial.gov as #NCT01144364.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据