4.7 Article

Adaptor protein Lnk binds to and inhibits normal and leukemic FLT3

期刊

BLOOD
卷 120, 期 16, 页码 3310-3317

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-10-388611

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01CA026038-32, U54CA143930, 2P01 HL073104-060]
  2. Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR
  3. investigator grant)
  4. Oncogenic Networks
  5. Deutsche Krebshilfe Stiftung
  6. Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg
  7. German Federal Ministry of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) is a receptor tyrosine kinase with important roles in hematopoietic progenitor cell survival and proliferation. It is mutated in approximately one-third of AML patients, mostly by internal tandem duplications (ITDs). Adaptor protein Lnk is a negative regulator of hematopoietic cytokine signaling. In the present study, we show that Lnk interacts physically with both wildtype FLT3 (FLT3-WT) and FLT3-ITD through the SH2 domains. We have identified the tyrosine residues 572, 591, and 919 of FLT3 as phosphorylation sites involved in direct binding to Lnk. Lnk itself was tyrosine phosphorylated by both FLT3 ligand (FL)-activated FLT3-WT and constitutively activated FLT3-ITD. Both shRNA-mediated depletion and forced overexpression of Lnk demonstrated that activation signals emanating from both forms of FLT3 are under negative regulation by Lnk. Moreover, Lnk inhibited 32D cell proliferation driven by different FLT3 variants. Analysis of primary BM cells from Lnk-knockout mice showed that Lnk suppresses the expansion of FL-stimulated hematopoietic progenitors, including lymphoid-primed multipotent progenitors. The results of the present study show that through direct binding to FLT3, Lnk suppresses FLT3-WT/ITD-dependent signaling pathways involved in the proliferation of hematopoietic cells. Therefore, modulation of Lnk expression levels may provide a unique therapeutic approach for FLT3-ITD-associated hematopoietic disease. (Blood. 2012;120(16):3310-3317)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据