4.7 Article

Loss of heterozygosity in 7q myeloid disorders: clinical associations and genomic pathogenesis

期刊

BLOOD
卷 119, 期 25, 页码 6109-6117

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-12-397620

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL082983, U54 RR019391, K24 HL077522]
  2. Department of Defense grant [MPO48018]
  3. Leukaemia & Lymphoma Research of the United Kingdom
  4. Fundacion Caja Madrid
  5. Robert Duggan Cancer Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Loss of heterozygosity affecting chromosome 7q is common in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes, pointing toward the essential role of this region in disease phenotype and clonal evolution. The higher resolution offered by recently developed genomic platforms may be used to establish more precise clinical correlations and identify specific target genes. We analyzed a series of patients with myeloid disorders using recent genomic technologies (1458 by single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays [SNP-A], 226 by next-generation sequencing, and 183 by expression microarrays). Using SNP-A, we identified chromosome 7q loss of heterozygosity segments in 161 of 1458 patients (11%); 26% of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia patients harbored 7q uniparental disomy, of which 41% had a homozygous EZH2 mutation. In addition, we describe an SNP-A-isolated deletion 7 hypocellular myelodysplastic syndrome subset, with a high rate of progression. Using direct and parallel sequencing, we found no recurrent mutations in typically large deletion 7q and monosomy 7 patients. In contrast, we detected a markedly decreased expression of genes included in our SNP-A defined minimally deleted regions. Although a 2-hit model is present in most patients with 7q uniparental disomy and a myeloproliferative phenotype, haplodeficient expression of defined regions of 7q may underlie pathogenesis in patients with deletions and predominant dysplastic features. (Blood. 2012;119(25):6109-6117)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据