4.7 Article

IL-7 and IL-15 instruct the generation of human memory stem T cells from naive precursors

期刊

BLOOD
卷 121, 期 4, 页码 573-584

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-05-431718

关键词

-

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [GR07-5 BO, RO10/07-B-1]
  2. Italian Ministry of Research and University (FIRB-IDEAS)
  3. Fondazione Cariplo
  4. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [AIRC 5x1000]
  5. EU-FP7 program (ATTACK, PERSIST)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-living memory stem T cells (T-SCM) with the ability to self-renew and the plasticity to differentiate into potent effectors could be valuable weapons in adoptive T-cell therapy against cancer. Nonetheless, procedures to specifically target this T-cell population remain elusive. Here, we show that it is possible to differentiate in vitro, expand, and gene modify in clinically compliant conditions CD8(+) T-SCM lymphocytes starting from naive precursors. Requirements for the generation of this T-cell subset, described as CD62L(+)CCR7(+)CD45RA(+)CD45R0(+)IL-7R alpha(+)CD95(+), are CD3/CD28 engagement and culture with IL-7 and IL-15. Accordingly, T-SCM accumulates early after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The gene expression signature and functional phenotype define this population as a distinct memory T-lymphocyte subset, intermediate between naive and central memory cells. When transplanted in immunodeficient mice, gene-modified naive-derived T-SCM prove superior to other memory lymphocytes for the ability to expand and differentiate into effectors able to mediate a potent xenogeneic GVHD. Furthermore, gene-modified T-SCM are the only T-cell subset able to expand and mediate GVHD on serial transplantation, suggesting self-renewal capacity in a clinically relevant setting. These findings provide novel insights into the origin and requirements for T-SCM generation and pave the way for their clinical rapid exploitation in adoptive cell therapy. (Blood. 2013; 121(4): 573-584)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据