4.7 Article

Outcomes after matched unrelated donor versus identical sibling hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults with acute myelogenous leukemia

期刊

BLOOD
卷 119, 期 17, 页码 3908-3916

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-09-381699

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [U24-CA76518]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [5U01HL069294]
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  4. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA/DHHS) [HHSH234200637015C]
  5. Office of Naval Research [N00014-06-1-0704, N00014-08-1-0058]
  6. Allos
  7. Amgen
  8. Angioblast

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Approximately one-third of patients with an indication for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have an HLA-matched related donor (MRD) available to them. For the remaining patients, a matched unrelated donor (MUD) is an alternative. Prior studies comparing MRD and MUD HCT provide conflicting results, and the relative efficacy of MRD and MUD transplantation is an area of active investigation. To address this issue, we analyzed outcomes of 2223 adult acute myelogenous leukemia patients who underwent allogeneic HCT between 2002 and 2006 (MRD, n = 624; 8/8 HLA locus matched MUD, n = 1193; 7/8 MUD, n = 406). The 100-day cumulative incidence of grades B-D acute GVHD was significantly lower in MRD HCT recipients than in 8/8 MUD and 7/8 MUD HCT recipients (33%, 51%, and 53%, respectively; P < 001). In multivariate analysis, 8/8 MUD HCT recipients had a similar survival rate compared with MRD HCT recipients (relative risk [RR], 1.03; P = .62). 7/8 MUD HCT recipients had higher early mortality than MRD HCT recipients (RR, 1.40; P < .001), but beyond 6 months after HCT, their survival rates were similar (RR, 0.88; P = .30). These results suggest that transplantation from MUD and MRD donors results in similar survival times for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia. (Blood. 2012;119(17):3908-3916)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据