4.7 Article

Super-resolution imaging of remodeled synaptic actin reveals different synergies between NK cell receptors and integrins

期刊

BLOOD
卷 120, 期 18, 页码 3729-3740

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-05-429977

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. Biotechnology and Biologic Sciences Research Council
  3. Woflson Royal Society
  4. Lister Institute
  5. Marie Curie Fellowship
  6. Wellcome Trust
  7. Fell Fund
  8. Edward Penley Abraha Cephalosporin Fund
  9. Medical Research Council [G1001044, G0500563] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. MRC [G0500563, G1001044] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural killer (NK) cells secrete lytic granules to directly kill virus-infected or transformed cells and secrete cytokines to communicate with other cells. Three-dimensional super-resolved images of F-actin, lytic granules, and IFN-gamma in primary human NK cells stimulated through different activating receptors reveal that both IFN-gamma and lytic granules accumulated in domains where the periodicity of the cortical actin mesh at the synapse opened up to be penetrable. Ligation of some activating receptors alone (eg, CD16 or NKG2D) was sufficient to increase the periodicity of the actin mesh, but surprisingly, ligation of others (eg, NKp46 or CD2) was not sufficient to induce cortical actin remodeling unless LFA-1 was coligated. Importantly, influenza virus particles that can be recognized by NK cells similarly did not open the actin mesh but could if LFA-1 was coligated. This leads us to propose that immune cells using germline-encoded receptors to directly recognize foreign proteins can use integrin recognition to differentiate between free pathogens and pathogen-infected cells that will both be present in blood. This distinction would not be required for NK cell receptors, such as NKG2D, which recognize host cell-encoded proteins that can only be found on diseased cells and not pathogens. (Blood. 2012; 120(18):3729-3740)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据