4.7 Article

Frequency and prognostic impact of mutations in SRSF2, U2AF1, and ZRSR2 in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

期刊

BLOOD
卷 119, 期 15, 页码 3578-3584

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-12-399337

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V [109003]
  2. Deutsche-Jose-Carreras Leukamie-Stiftung e.V [DJCLS R 10/22]
  3. H.W. & J. Hector Stiftung [M 47.1]
  4. Dieter-Schlag Stiftung [2011]
  5. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01EO0802]
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [HE 5240/4-1, TH 1779/1-1]
  7. Hannover Medical School (HiLF)
  8. Braukmann-Wittenberg-Herz-Stiftung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in genes of the splicing machinery have been described recently in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). In the present study, we examined a cohort of 193 MDS patients for mutations in SRSF2, U2AF1 (synonym U2AF35), ZRSR2, and, as described previously, SF3B1, in the context of other molecular markers, including mutations in ASXL1, RUNX1, NRAS, TP53, IDH1, IDH2, NPM1, and DNMT3A. Mutations in SRSF2, U2AF1, ZRSR2, and SF3B1 were found in 24 (12.4%), 14 (7.3%), 6 (3.1%), and 28 (14.5%) patients, respectively, corresponding to a total of 67 of 193 MDS patients (34.7%). SRSF2 mutations were associated with RUNX1 (P < .001) and IDH1 (P = .013) mutations, whereas U2AF1 mutations were associated with ASXL1 (P = .005) and DNMT3A (P = .004) mutations. In univariate analysis, mutated SRSF2 predicted shorter overall survival and more frequent acute myeloid leukemia progression compared with wildtype SRSF2, whereas mutated U2AF1, ZRSR2, and SF3B1 had no impact on patient outcome. In multivariate analysis, SRSF2 remained an independent poor risk marker for overall survival (hazard ratio = 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-4.13; P = .017) and acute myeloid leukemia progression (hazard ratio = 2.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-6.12; P = .008). These results show a negative prognostic impact of SRSF2 mutations in MDS. SRSF2 mutations may become useful for clinical risk stratification and treatment decisions in the future. (Blood. 2012;119(15):3578-3584)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据