4.7 Article

The origin and function of platelet glycosyltransferases

期刊

BLOOD
卷 120, 期 3, 页码 626-635

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-02-409235

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish Medical Research Council Award
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. Agnes and Poul Friis
  4. Carlsberg Foundation
  5. Program of Excellence, Copenhagen Center of Glycomics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen
  6. National Institutes of Health [HL56949, PO1HL107146, HL089224, HL68130]
  7. ZymeQuest

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Platelets are megakaryocyte subfragments that participate in hemostatic and host defense reactions and deliver pro- and antiangiogenic factors throughout the vascular system. Although they are anucleated cells that lack a complex secretory apparatus with distinct Golgi/endoplasmic reticulum compartments, past studies have shown that platelets have glycosyltransferase activities. In the present study, we show that members of 3 distinct glycosyltransferase families are found within and on the surface of platelets. Immunocytology and flow cytometry results indicated that megakaryocytes package these Golgi-derived glycosyltransferases into vesicles that are sent via proplatelets to nascent platelets, where they accumulate. These glycosyltransferases are active, and intact platelets glycosylate large exogenous substrates. Furthermore, we show that activation of platelets results in the release of soluble glycosyltransferase activities and that platelets contain sufficient levels of sugar nucleotides for detection of glycosylation of exogenously added substrates. Therefore, the results of the present study show that blood platelets are a rich source of both glycosyltransferases and donor sugar substrates that can be released to function in the extracellular space. This platelet-glycosylation machinery offers a pathway to a simple glycoengineering strategy improving storage of platelets and may serve hitherto unknown biologic functions. (Blood. 2012;120(3):626-635)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据